Of uitmation propered to an letter 2011 Oct 95 (in 18100/95) to be sent as to treating this question under Cric.
If get been sent, 30 Dec. 1894 a we has not were waiting to hear from W.O. what areas parts of the Military Reserve are to be surrendered; but that G reading W. Pollock's memo. Enclosed in this despr, W. Chamberlain is disposed to think that there is much force in contention that the area in question ought not to be regarded as Military Land at all within the meaning of the Circular, since it has not been formally so defined in the War Dept., but has merely been, as it were, in a condition of suspense, pending a final decision as to the areas over which it was necessary for the W.O. to have clearance rights; and as a decision has now been taken that a portion (at least) of the area under fjern is not requiring to be subject to any military restrictions, it appears to W. Chamberlain to be a fair and reasonable course that the reserve rights are required should be simply given to the W.O. in exchange for the reserve rights, temporarily exercised over the areas proposed to be surrendered, without regard to the respective values of the two areas in question.
[There is an analogy for this sort of exchange in the Case which was arranged between W.O. & Treasury without any prior communication with this office, see corr. in print (A259) Su19/11/96 CPL. 20 Lotre].
The point to emphasise is that the land in question has long been in private occupation, though subject to certain restrictions as to the right of building upon it on military grounds. These restrictions have now been withdrawn with the result that the private owners occupy the land in the ordinary way. The military authorities have conceded the user of the land, and there is no question of valuing them under the Circular. I would not go into the question of exchange in that it admits that...
of
uitmation propered to an letter 2011 Oct 95 (in 18100/95) to be sent
as to treating this question
under Cric.
If
get been sent,
30 Dec. 1894
a we
has not
were
waiting
to hear from W.O. what areas parts
of the Military
Reserve are to be
surrendered; but that
G
reading
W. Pollock's memo. Enclosed in this despr, W. (hamberlain is disposed to Mink that there is much force in contention that the area in question ought not to be regarded
Military
Land at all within the meaning of
but has the Cricular, since in the war dept, birea formally so defined,
been
or handed over to
A
Since 1883 merely been, as it were, condition of suspense, pending to the grastimay
in a
a final decisim as
areas over
which it was
necessary
decision has
for the W.O. to have clearanc rights; and as a
now
been taken that a portion (at least) of the area undre fjern
wired to be tha
is not requiring
subject to any
restrictions
clea
military grounds, but that other
areas (see
Enc. in 4033/95.
required by the War deft instead
of the areas
which wer
temporarily subjected
A
B
to wiilding
restrictims, it appears
WWW. Chamberlain to be a fair
I reasonable course that the
thee will tops reserves rights
arm
arequired
should be simply given to the W.0. in Exchange for the reserve rights, temporarily exercised 600
over the areas proposed to be
without regard surrendered
of
to the respective values The two areas in question, and adder despesenter ter propaat,
[There is an
sort of exchange
Case
which wa
analogy for
Ceylon
arranged
Neir
between
W.O. I Treasury without any
prior
office
Cor
nication with this
see corr.inprint (A259]
Su19/11/96 CPL. 20
Lotre
The point to Emphasise is that the hand in
Justin have alongs dan in private occupation, though dubject
to certain restrictions as to the right of building upon
on military group's Thess. These restrictions hour grow bun withdrawn with The won't that the private owners occupy the land in the Ordinary way. The military authorities have Conaugments suva havde the user of the land: & there is no grustion of valuing them under the circular, I wree not go into the question of exchange In that indmits that
Ye
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.